In my blog entry, entitled “5 reasons to smile today,” I mentioned an article on Copyblogger about writing with passion. I certainly put a lot of passion into my blog entry earlier this week when I pointed out lots of grammatical errors in a Wall Street Journal article. It might be fun to call attention to errors and try to help people improve, but I thought I’d take a minute to add a few caveats to my criticism.
Journalism is a thankless job. I was a reporter before and I can empathize with the stresses, deadlines and demands of that position. With news being published 24/7 and a pressing need to get news out as quickly as possible, spelling accuracy might not be the highest priority.
I’m actually quite impressed by the job authors John D. Stoll and Neil King Jr. did on the Wall Street Journal article “GM Auditors Raise Doubts on Auto Maker’s Viability.” They went out and got great interviews, and interpreted a lot of history and data in a short space. I wouldn’t really blame them for the lack of quality in their grammar. Editors should be responsible for quality assurance before throwing mistakes online for all the world to see.
To be fair, the Wall Street Journal fixed the mistakes in that article not too long after it was published. People in the media do a lot of things right, so I hate to just point out their mistakes. I say, keep up the good work – but be sure to use spellchecker.
I feel even better now than I did after writing my earlier post about the Wall Street Journal’s highly visible mistakes. Keep checking the eHarbor Blog for the down-low on ecommerce and great search engine optimization tactics. The photo of water about to splash people is from Flickr and it is the copyright of zmxncbv.com.
