Posts Tagged ‘content’

I link, therefore I am… on top of Google

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

I enjoy Webmarketing123’s free Webinars on Internet marketing. I always learn a lot from them, and I try to apply what I learn. Today, I’ll talk about what I learned at their August 5, 2009 Webinar, “Advanced SEO Webinar: Linking Best Practices.”

Confusing keyboard arrows

The five things a website needs to get ranked on the first page of Google results are:

1. Keywords – The search terms you want people to type into a search engine in order to find your Web page.

2. Site Content – You need to use your chosen keywords in your website’s text to show search engines your site is relevant to those topics.

3. Meta Content – You don’t usually see this content, but it must be there in the backend of your site and in your Web page titles.

4. URLs – Include important keywords in your URLs. For example, it is better to have a URL like www.eharborinc.com/blog/2009/07/17/is-twitter-overhyped, which includes the date and headline keywords, than something like www.eharborinc.com/blog/post-81. The second URL gives no clue as to what it contains, while the first one gives a much better idea of the page’s subject matter.

5. Inbound Links – These are links (or votes) from other websites to your site. Search engines look at both the number and quality of the links you receive from other sites.

We’re starting a new blog on the newly redesigned Submit Solution website, which will debut soon. We’ll be shifting attention from the eHarbor Blog to that one soon. You can find the rest of this blog entry there. Stay tuned!

The photo of the confusing keyboard arrows is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of jeremyfoo.

Will Kindle hurt book publishers?

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

The Kindle DX’s launch last week brings up an interesting discussion on the value of content in the digital age. I couldn’t cover this whole discussion before, so now I’ll follow up on that discussion, as I promised to do in my first blog entry on Kindle.

Kindle atop a stack of books

I read another article on Kindle in Information Week, entitled “Amazon’s Kindle DX Poses Profitability Challenge To Publishers.” This article focused on a different effect Kindle DX can have on publishers. The publishers it discusses are not in the news media, but the textbook industry.

Apparently, a comparatively lightweight, digital copy of textbooks appeals to schools looking to save money for themselves and students. Textbooks can be expensive and heavy to carry from class to class, so Kindle’s new version offers a useful option. But the idea of turning their products into electronic copies doesn’t appeal to textbook publishers because of the negative impact that would likely have on their value and, thus, company profits.

The reason behind publishers’ hesitance to include their textbooks on Kindle is quite intriguing.

In the article, the author points out, “One fact that’s sure to keep shareholders up at night is the drop in the value of content once it becomes digital, sometimes as much as 50%, analysts have said.”

By publishing a written work in an electronic format, its value falls. The printing press, introduced centuries ago, made books much less expensive and time-consuming to create, lowering their value to a level attainable by more people. Perhaps the Internet is our new version of the printing press, allowing information to be shared cheaply and quickly, compared to traditional media forms.

By avoiding the costs of printing, binding and distributing books, these publishers could maintain their profits while lowering prices. But change is often scary, even if it has many positive points.

The article points out that the world is changing, and it’s becoming more difficult to ignore new technologies. I covered a similar topic on businesses that have yet to enter the ecommerce industry in my previous eHarbor Blog entry, called “Strong sales attract retailers to ecommerce.” We can look to the music industry to see the consequences of failing to take advantage of online services in a timely manner, the article also notes.

The photo of a Kindle atop textbooks is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of KNK.

Step 7 to topping Google: Site promotion

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

As promised in my last blog entry, this is the seventh and final part of this series on strong search engine optimization strategies. We’ll close this series by discussing how to promote your website and get noticed by your target audience.

Misspelled Advanced Web Design sign

Don’t expect your website to become popular overnight. Traffic doesn’t come to your site just because you get your site ranked high on search engines for specific key terms. You need to provide services and content of interest to your audience, and you must get out there and share the good news about your site.

A great way to let people know about your services and website is to blog about them. Search engines love blogs because they are constantly being updated with fresh content, full of (hopefully) relevant links, and magnets for attention from the blogosphere, if you do them right.

For instance, I recently blogged about eHarbor’s creation of Squidoo lenses. We created Squidoo lenses for:

- eHarbor, Inc.

- Magellan Commerce

- Submit Solution

- Real Estate Promoter

Squidoo is a great tool for showing off your products, services, talents, knowledge or anything, really.

Social media sites are another great way to promote your website. Once you write a blog entry or fill your website with strong content, submit it to social media sites to get the word out.

Here are some of the sites eHarbor uses:

- Delicious

- Digg

- Diigo

- Propeller

- Reddit

- StumbleUpon

- Technorati

- Twitter

It’s also a good idea to add your business to Google’s Local Business Center. This allows you to show up on Google Map searches, and also to have a map of your company’s location next to your search result on Google.

Try not to get to excited or start spamming social media sites with news that isn’t particularly useful. Just be wise and moderate in your attempts to promote your website, and you should do fine.

Wow! This has been a fun series to write. I hope you enjoyed learning about Web page titles, optimizing images, simplifying URLs, improving website navigation, and including relevant anchor text with links.

We’ve got plenty of other great ecommerce topics to talk about in the eHarbor Blog, so stick around. Check out Google’s SEO Starter Guide for more information on search engine optimization.

The photo of the misspelled “Advanced Web Design” sign is from Flickr and it is the copyright of agjimenez.

Imperfect-but-good content in the Wall Street Journal

Friday, March 13th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

In my blog entry, entitled “5 reasons to smile today,” I mentioned an article on Copyblogger about writing with passion. I certainly put a lot of passion into my blog entry earlier this week when I pointed out lots of grammatical errors in a Wall Street Journal article. It might be fun to call attention to errors and try to help people improve, but I thought I’d take a minute to add a few caveats to my criticism.

Crowd surprised by falling waterJournalism is a thankless job. I was a reporter before and I can empathize with the stresses, deadlines and demands of that position. With news being published 24/7 and a pressing need to get news out as quickly as possible, spelling accuracy might not be the highest priority.

I’m actually quite impressed by the job authors John D. Stoll and Neil King Jr. did on the Wall Street Journal article “GM Auditors Raise Doubts on Auto Maker’s Viability.” They went out and got great interviews, and interpreted a lot of history and data in a short space. I wouldn’t really blame them for the lack of quality in their grammar. Editors should be responsible for quality assurance before throwing mistakes online for all the world to see.

To be fair, the Wall Street Journal fixed the mistakes in that article not too long after it was published. People in the media do a lot of things right, so I hate to just point out their mistakes. I say, keep up the good work – but be sure to use spellchecker.

I feel even better now than I did after writing my earlier post about the Wall Street Journal’s highly visible mistakes. Keep checking the eHarbor Blog for the down-low on ecommerce and great search engine optimization tactics. The photo of water about to splash people is from Flickr and it is the copyright of zmxncbv.com.

Step 6 to topping Google: Strong anchor text

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

Welcome to part 6 of our multi-part series on effective search engine optimization tactics. You may notice that in many of my blog entries, I include links to past blog entries and other informative sites. I try to include appropriate text for each link in order to give you (and search engines) an idea of what information the link will contain. This Ship anchor in Greenock, Scotlandtext, known as anchor text, is another way to optimize your website for search engines.

Anchor text should be specific and closely related to the topic you are addressing. If you put in random links that are neither relevant to your content, nor descriptive of the information on the linked site, you are wasting your time. Links should be helpful to your website’s visitors, offering them additional information in a highly visible manner.

For instance, if I want to create a link to the Submit Solution website, I simply link the text “Submit Solution” to http://www.submitsolution.com. So when you see text that is blue, purple or red, you know that it links you to Submit Solution’s website or at least something related to Submit Solution (which, by the way, is a division of eHarbor, Inc.). As a bonus, search engines like Google, Yahoo and MSN also use the anchor text to understand the relevance of that page to this one, potentially boosting your ranking.

Here are some good ideas to consider when choosing anchor text for your links:

- Keep your text short and descriptive. Brevity seems to be a common theme in this SEO series – like in my blog entry on optimizing images.

- Avoid generic terms like “Click here” or “article.” Those really don’t describe what the link is, and there are many other creative ways to anchor your links. Come to think of it, I mentioned avoiding generic terms in my blog entry on Web page titles, as well. It feels like we’re coming full-circle in this series.

- Don’t use the actual URL as the anchor text, unless you have a good reason. I used the URL of Submit Solution above simply as an illustration. You can also include a URL to promote your website, if it is new or poorly connected at the moment. You know, I think we discussed good URL practices earlier, as well.

- Make sure your links are easy to spot. If you use a style that makes links look just like regular text, people won’t be able to find them, and they won’t be much use.

By the way, including internal links to different parts of your website can help visitors navigate your website more freely and intuitively. Give it a shot, but don’t go overboard. Make sure the links are meaningful and add to the message of the page you are currently working on. Improving website navigation – that’s another topic we’ve covered before on the eHarbor Blog! Simply amazing.

This is the sixth part of this series. We started with a blog post on making content king, and we’ve covered a number of topics along the way. We’re coming close to the end of this series on strong SEO practices. We’ve got plenty of other great ecommerce topics to talk about, as well. Check out Google’s SEO Starter Guide for more information on this topic. The photo of the naval monument in Greenock, Scotland is from Flickr and it is the copyright of Bob the courier.

Is your grammar better than The Wall Street Journal’s?

Monday, March 9th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

I love reading news and blogs, but sometimes I can’t help wondering why on earth a piece got published in its flawed condition. I’m a natural editor, so when I’m reading I’m also critiquing and trying to understand what the author is really saying. When I notice improper grammar or simple spelling errors, I am pulled out of the story. Sometimes it gives me severe whiplash.

266-degree temperature reading

The reason I bring this up is because I read an article on Thursday, March 5, 2009 in The Wall Street Journal, entitled “GM Auditors Raise Doubts on Auto Maker’s Viability.” The article was so poorly written that I just had to start writing about it to get it out of my head and encourage others to learn from it.

Just look at these mistakes, with my commentary (in italics) beneath each one:

- The news sent GM sparked a deep drop in the company’s stock.
Sent GM sparked? It looks like they started one thought, but then came up with different wording and simply forgot to go back and edit it. They probably meant to say, “The news sparked a deep drop in the company’s stock.”

- “Our recurring losses form operations, stockholders’ deficits an dinability to generate sufficient cashflow to meet our obligations and sustain our operations raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern,” GM said it is annual 10K filing.
So many mistakes in one paragraph. This is the part that forced me to start writing. I’m amazed by all of the errors in here. Didn’t anyone notice these during the editing process? For instance, I’m not sure what an dinability is, but I do know what “and inability” means. Also, I had no idea that recurring losses form operations. How interesting.

- GM also said that expects to record a significant loss that could exceed $1 billion over the reorganization of Saab, its Swedish auto maker in bankruptcy protection.
So close.

- On Thursday, however, German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck told Deutschlandfunk radio that GM still hasn’t provided a plan that justifies government help for restructuring Opel. “What we have received so far is no basis for the government to make a decision,” Mr. Steinbrueck told the radio.
That last word makes it sound like Mr. Steinbrueck was talking to an actual radio. That’s a funny image, but it’s not quite what the authors meant to say. It would have been better to include “station” after radio or something like that.

You might remember my blog post on making content king on your website. In that post, I discussed grammatical errors in a New York Times article. Even respected publications like these can make serious errors that hurt their credibility. Be sure to edit your work before you publish it so that people can listen to what you have to say without focusing so much on the way you say it.

I’ll get back to writing about ecommerce and search engine optimization in my next blog post. I just had to get this off my chest. Whew! I feel much better now. The photo of the abnormally high temperature is from Flickr and it is the copyright of Sister72.

Step 4 to topping Google: Simplify URLs

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

Welcome to part 4 of our multi-part series on effective search engine optimization practices. I took a little break in my last blog entry to talk about some fun things that make me smile. Let’s back to talking about important SEO tactics. We’ve talked about making content king on your website, adding concise Web page titles, and optimizing images on your site. Now we’ll talk about simplifying your Web pages’ URLs.

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) movie posterTo start things off, it’s time once more for me to apply my love of movies to the discussion at hand. As Indiana Jones noted in a key scene of “Raiders of the Lost Ark” (1981), “Belloq’s staff is too long. They’re digging in the wrong place! You’ve probably seen that movie, so you know that Indy’s nemesis had part of the instructions to build the staff of Ra, but because his staff was too long he was led to the wrong place in his search for the Ark of the Covenant.

All of this is highly applicable to URLs. If a URL is too long, it can be difficult for customers to remember and difficult for search engines like Google, MSN and Yahoo to catalog. If Indy were a webmaster, he would probably have said, “Belloq’s URL is too long. They’re Digging in the wrong place!”

That might be a little silly, though.

Examples of long URLs that are poorly structured and hard to follow can be found at Mapquest and Google. On Mapquest, I looked up the mailing address of eHarbor, Inc. and it gave me this: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Orem&state=UT&address=13
23+N+Research+Way&zipcode=84097&cat=eHarbor%2C+Inc.#a/se
a
rch/l::1323+Research+Way:Orem:UT:84097-6200:US:40.321124:-1

11.680809:address:Utah+County:1/m::15:40.324683:-111.679178:
0:::::/so:Eharbor+Inc:::r::25:::::/e
.

Google searches are a little better. Here’s the URL of a search I did for eHarbor: http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=
1G1GGLQ_ENUS311&=&q=eharbor&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f
.

Now that’s a mouthful.

I don’t mean to slight Mapquest or Google. The purpose of their URLs isn’t necessarily to look pretty and get posted on websites. They exist solely to contain search parameters and show people what they’re looking up. However, in the world of ecommerce, keywords are essential, and you want your URLs to reflect that.

Here are some principles that can help you create strong URLs for your Web pages:

- Use a simple organization structure on your website. For instance, on the Magellan Commerce website, if you click on the “Features” tab, you will go to this URL: http://www.magellancommerce.com/features. Very simple. Just add a / to your main URL and include a word or phrase describing what is in that section. As you add content to sub-pages, you can simply add another / and additional words describing the content on those pages.

- Along with the first point, it’s better to use words than numbers in your URLs. Words are much more “friendly” to your site’s visitors and they help optimize your pages for search engines. Using “page 1” or seemingly random numbers and code to organize your URLs isn’t pretty and doesn’t help much with SEO.

- Don’t use too many keywords in your URLs. Be brief but descriptive about what people can expect to find on each Web page. No need for a whole lot of repetition.

- Only create one URL for each Web page. It’s possible to have multiple sub-domains and versions of a URL. For instance, you could have http://submitsolution.com and http://www.submitsolution.com go to two different sites. Choose one form of a URL, with or without www, and stick with it. Also, you’re better off only using lower-case letters in URLs, instead of mixing capital letters in.

This is the fourth part of this series. We’ll cover several other ways to achieve SEO in upcoming blog entries. Check out Google’s SEO Starter Guide for more information on this topic. The “Raiders of the Lost Ark” movie poster is from Flickr and it is the copyright of MDH in Houston.

Step 1 to topping Google: Make content king

Friday, February 13th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

Content is king. If you don’t have great content on your website, you’ll probably never have much success attracting Web traffic.

In my last blog entry, I talked about the importance of using search engine optimization in your ecommerce strategies. But how exactly do you do search engine optimization? That’s the $64,000 question. This is the first of a series of steps you can take to get on the right track to the top of search engines, like Google, Yahoo and MSN. Some of these are fairly common-sense, but others might require a little more in-depth knowledge of Web design. Experts in eHarbor’s divisions, Magellan Commerce, Submit Solution, Real Estate Promoter and Direct Home Find, are a great resource for figuring out all of the complex details of SEO.

Lion overlooking his kingdom

The first, and most important, step to achieving SEO is to create content that is relevant and interesting to your customers. Writing content that grabs the right people’s attention and gives them something of value is the best thing you can do to get them to your site. Otherwise, people won’t see any reason to come back to your site, even if it pops up first on search engines.

Having a great-looking website with good organization is important, but filling that site with excellent content is where the most essential work lies. You must research who your targeted audience is and what their main concerns and questions are. Then create content on those topics to answer their questions so they will see you as an authority on the subject. Another benefit of having great content is that it will get the attention of other
bloggers/webmasters, persuading them to link to your site. This is the best offsite way to achieve SEO. It can’t be just any content, though; it has to be high-quality content, if you want to gain respect and business.

Good grammar and spelling are also a big part of creating good Web content. If your text is littered with glaring spelling errors, you won’t look like an expert, no matter how good your research or information is. For example, check out this article from the New York Times entitled “Economy Shed 598,000 in January.” I noticed several problems with the grammar and punctuation of this article, causing me to question how much I can trust the information in it. Here are some of the problems:

- In the third and tenth paragraphs, “Over all” is used when “Overall” would be the correct term.

- In the ninth paragraph, we find this: “average weekly earnings climbed $614.72, up $1.67.” I believe the author meant to say “average weekly earnings climbed to $614.72, up $1.67.” Otherwise, that would be an incredible jump of both $614.72 and $1.67.

- In the twelfth paragraph, they forgot to put an a in “the new report offered no hint that bottom was in sight.” I checked back a little after the article was published and I noticed they had fixed this error, so that’s a good sign.

- The author forgot to put a period at the end of the last sentence of the eighteenth paragraph.

These are all fairly minor errors, but they show that even the work of the New York Times, which has the benefit of being edited by some of the top editors in the business, can still have mistakes. It appears that they corrected almost all of these mistakes in their updated version, so it’s nice to see they take care of quality after the fact. The point is that you should not only do your homework and add relevant content to your website regularly, but you should also make sure that what you put on your site meets the quality standards your readership expects.

As I mentioned at the beginning, this is just the first part of this series. We’ll cover several other ways to achieve SEO in upcoming blog entries. Be sure to come back to the eHarbor Blog often for updates. I am indebted to Google’s SEO Starter Guide for much of the information in this blog entry. The photo of the lion is from Flickr and it is the copyright of law_keven.