Posts Tagged ‘image’

Finding Superman image on Google no easy feat

Thursday, October 1st, 2009

By Robert Lockard

The other day, I had an image in my mind of a strange object and I wanted to find a picture of it online. The only problem was I didn’t have a clue what it was called. The image in my head was of a scene in “Superman II” when General Zod’s henchman Non is in the Oval Office and he’s staring intently at something. It’s five metal balls tied to strings in a row and the ones on either end keep hitting the four still balls, causing the ball on the other end to bounce away and come back again.

Maybe you already know what I’m talking about.

I turned to one of my coworkers here at eHarbor, Inc. and asked her to help me. She could picture it, as well, but she couldn’t put her finger on the name. I tried searching for “metal ball attached to strings hitting each other” on Google, but I didn’t find what I was looking for. Luckily, my resourceful coworker found it on Amazon.com, I believe. I could now put a name to an image – Newton’s cradle!

This story illustrates my need for a visual search engine and not simply a text-based one. Luckily, Microsoft and Google are both heading in that direction. I read about their efforts in a CNN article entitled, “Microsoft, Google expand search-engine tools.”

You can find the rest of this blog entry on the Submit Solution SEO Blog on October 6, 2009. The photo of Newton’s cradle is from Flickr, and it is the copyright of ƒяαиcєscα яσsє.


Newton's cradle in motion

What Google might have been

Monday, April 20th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

This photo of a Google postcard just tickled my funny bone, so I have to share it.

Google search on a postcard

After my seven-part series on search engine optimization tactics to get to the top of Google searches, I think my readers have become fairly knowledgeable about the complexities of search engines.

This fun photo gives us a chance to stand back and smile at how Google might have started out if it had existed in the 1980s or earlier.

The photo is the copyright of dullhunk on Flickr.

Imperfect-but-good content in the Wall Street Journal

Friday, March 13th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

In my blog entry, entitled “5 reasons to smile today,” I mentioned an article on Copyblogger about writing with passion. I certainly put a lot of passion into my blog entry earlier this week when I pointed out lots of grammatical errors in a Wall Street Journal article. It might be fun to call attention to errors and try to help people improve, but I thought I’d take a minute to add a few caveats to my criticism.

Crowd surprised by falling waterJournalism is a thankless job. I was a reporter before and I can empathize with the stresses, deadlines and demands of that position. With news being published 24/7 and a pressing need to get news out as quickly as possible, spelling accuracy might not be the highest priority.

I’m actually quite impressed by the job authors John D. Stoll and Neil King Jr. did on the Wall Street Journal article “GM Auditors Raise Doubts on Auto Maker’s Viability.” They went out and got great interviews, and interpreted a lot of history and data in a short space. I wouldn’t really blame them for the lack of quality in their grammar. Editors should be responsible for quality assurance before throwing mistakes online for all the world to see.

To be fair, the Wall Street Journal fixed the mistakes in that article not too long after it was published. People in the media do a lot of things right, so I hate to just point out their mistakes. I say, keep up the good work – but be sure to use spellchecker.

I feel even better now than I did after writing my earlier post about the Wall Street Journal’s highly visible mistakes. Keep checking the eHarbor Blog for the down-low on ecommerce and great search engine optimization tactics. The photo of water about to splash people is from Flickr and it is the copyright of zmxncbv.com.

Is your grammar better than The Wall Street Journal’s?

Monday, March 9th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

I love reading news and blogs, but sometimes I can’t help wondering why on earth a piece got published in its flawed condition. I’m a natural editor, so when I’m reading I’m also critiquing and trying to understand what the author is really saying. When I notice improper grammar or simple spelling errors, I am pulled out of the story. Sometimes it gives me severe whiplash.

266-degree temperature reading

The reason I bring this up is because I read an article on Thursday, March 5, 2009 in The Wall Street Journal, entitled “GM Auditors Raise Doubts on Auto Maker’s Viability.” The article was so poorly written that I just had to start writing about it to get it out of my head and encourage others to learn from it.

Just look at these mistakes, with my commentary (in italics) beneath each one:

- The news sent GM sparked a deep drop in the company’s stock.
Sent GM sparked? It looks like they started one thought, but then came up with different wording and simply forgot to go back and edit it. They probably meant to say, “The news sparked a deep drop in the company’s stock.”

- “Our recurring losses form operations, stockholders’ deficits an dinability to generate sufficient cashflow to meet our obligations and sustain our operations raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern,” GM said it is annual 10K filing.
So many mistakes in one paragraph. This is the part that forced me to start writing. I’m amazed by all of the errors in here. Didn’t anyone notice these during the editing process? For instance, I’m not sure what an dinability is, but I do know what “and inability” means. Also, I had no idea that recurring losses form operations. How interesting.

- GM also said that expects to record a significant loss that could exceed $1 billion over the reorganization of Saab, its Swedish auto maker in bankruptcy protection.
So close.

- On Thursday, however, German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck told Deutschlandfunk radio that GM still hasn’t provided a plan that justifies government help for restructuring Opel. “What we have received so far is no basis for the government to make a decision,” Mr. Steinbrueck told the radio.
That last word makes it sound like Mr. Steinbrueck was talking to an actual radio. That’s a funny image, but it’s not quite what the authors meant to say. It would have been better to include “station” after radio or something like that.

You might remember my blog post on making content king on your website. In that post, I discussed grammatical errors in a New York Times article. Even respected publications like these can make serious errors that hurt their credibility. Be sure to edit your work before you publish it so that people can listen to what you have to say without focusing so much on the way you say it.

I’ll get back to writing about ecommerce and search engine optimization in my next blog post. I just had to get this off my chest. Whew! I feel much better now. The photo of the abnormally high temperature is from Flickr and it is the copyright of Sister72.

Worst time traveler ever

Friday, February 27th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

You know how in “Back to the Future Part II,” the future (2015) was going to be an awesome time when everyone would have flying cars, hoverboards, self-lacing shoes and self-drying clothes? Things have turned out a little differently.

Just imagine how people in the past would react if one of us went back in time and told them some of the silly things we use our advanced technology for. I think it might go something like this (Click on the photo below to see a larger, clearer version):

Time traveler explains Twitter to 1950s people

We’ll talk about ecommerce topics in the next post on the eHarbor Blog. I just wanted to share this picture because it makes me laugh – a lot.

Step 4 to topping Google: Simplify URLs

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

Welcome to part 4 of our multi-part series on effective search engine optimization practices. I took a little break in my last blog entry to talk about some fun things that make me smile. Let’s back to talking about important SEO tactics. We’ve talked about making content king on your website, adding concise Web page titles, and optimizing images on your site. Now we’ll talk about simplifying your Web pages’ URLs.

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) movie posterTo start things off, it’s time once more for me to apply my love of movies to the discussion at hand. As Indiana Jones noted in a key scene of “Raiders of the Lost Ark” (1981), “Belloq’s staff is too long. They’re digging in the wrong place! You’ve probably seen that movie, so you know that Indy’s nemesis had part of the instructions to build the staff of Ra, but because his staff was too long he was led to the wrong place in his search for the Ark of the Covenant.

All of this is highly applicable to URLs. If a URL is too long, it can be difficult for customers to remember and difficult for search engines like Google, MSN and Yahoo to catalog. If Indy were a webmaster, he would probably have said, “Belloq’s URL is too long. They’re Digging in the wrong place!”

That might be a little silly, though.

Examples of long URLs that are poorly structured and hard to follow can be found at Mapquest and Google. On Mapquest, I looked up the mailing address of eHarbor, Inc. and it gave me this: http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Orem&state=UT&address=13
23+N+Research+Way&zipcode=84097&cat=eHarbor%2C+Inc.#a/se
a
rch/l::1323+Research+Way:Orem:UT:84097-6200:US:40.321124:-1

11.680809:address:Utah+County:1/m::15:40.324683:-111.679178:
0:::::/so:Eharbor+Inc:::r::25:::::/e
.

Google searches are a little better. Here’s the URL of a search I did for eHarbor: http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=
1G1GGLQ_ENUS311&=&q=eharbor&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f
.

Now that’s a mouthful.

I don’t mean to slight Mapquest or Google. The purpose of their URLs isn’t necessarily to look pretty and get posted on websites. They exist solely to contain search parameters and show people what they’re looking up. However, in the world of ecommerce, keywords are essential, and you want your URLs to reflect that.

Here are some principles that can help you create strong URLs for your Web pages:

- Use a simple organization structure on your website. For instance, on the Magellan Commerce website, if you click on the “Features” tab, you will go to this URL: http://www.magellancommerce.com/features. Very simple. Just add a / to your main URL and include a word or phrase describing what is in that section. As you add content to sub-pages, you can simply add another / and additional words describing the content on those pages.

- Along with the first point, it’s better to use words than numbers in your URLs. Words are much more “friendly” to your site’s visitors and they help optimize your pages for search engines. Using “page 1” or seemingly random numbers and code to organize your URLs isn’t pretty and doesn’t help much with SEO.

- Don’t use too many keywords in your URLs. Be brief but descriptive about what people can expect to find on each Web page. No need for a whole lot of repetition.

- Only create one URL for each Web page. It’s possible to have multiple sub-domains and versions of a URL. For instance, you could have http://submitsolution.com and http://www.submitsolution.com go to two different sites. Choose one form of a URL, with or without www, and stick with it. Also, you’re better off only using lower-case letters in URLs, instead of mixing capital letters in.

This is the fourth part of this series. We’ll cover several other ways to achieve SEO in upcoming blog entries. Check out Google’s SEO Starter Guide for more information on this topic. The “Raiders of the Lost Ark” movie poster is from Flickr and it is the copyright of MDH in Houston.

Step 3 to topping Google: Optimize your images

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

By Robert Lockard

Welcome to part 3 of our multi-part series on constructive search engine optimization practices.

In my last two blog entries, I discussed strong content writing and Web page titles as ways to build search engine optimization for your website. Today I’ll discuss optimizing images. Everyone loves a good image because it can add something special to your story and make a positive impression on readers. I like using them to add humor to my posts and visually describe what my post is about.

Three sleeping kittens

I’ll use the image above to illustrate good ways to optimize your images. By the way, I love cats, just like I love movies, and that’s why I’m using a picture of kittens. If you put your mouse over the image, you’ll see a caption pop up that says “Three kittens from the same litter snuggle together for a nap.” That is the image title or caption.

If you right-click the photo and hit the “Properties” button, you’ll find additional information that is used by search engines, like Google, MSN and Yahoo, to “see” what is in the images. Search engines are blind, so you have to spell out exactly what is contained in an image for them to notice it. One way I optimized this image for search engines is by providing alt text, which appears when the image does not load properly. This helps people who are unable to see the image to know exactly what it is, and it also helps search engines at the same time. By adding relevant, succinct alt text, like “Three sleeping kittens,” you are that much closer to optimizing your image.

The location of the file is www.eharborinc.com/blog/images/2009/0
2/sleeping_kittens.jpg
. There are a number of lessons to learn from this file name and location. The file is in a specific folder that is meant only for eHarbor Blog photos. If every image’s file was located in a different place, it would be more difficult for search engines to go through and find them. It’s much better to have a good organizational system in place.

Most of the files we use in this blog are in JPEG format, but you can also use GIF, PNG or BMP to store your images. I find that JPEG is effective for my purposes, but each format has its own strengths and weaknesses, so you should pick and choose the format as your needs change. Also, keep the name short and simple. Don’t use generic names like “Image1.” I used “sleeping_kittens” because that pretty well describes the image.

This is the third part of this series. We’ll cover several other ways to achieve SEO in upcoming blog entries. Check out Google’s SEO Starter Guide for more information on this topic. The photo of the kittens is from Flickr and it is the copyright of Gúnna.